On Sunday 28 December 2008, Maspethrose7@aol.com wrote: > _marc@rintsch.de_ (mailto:marc@rintsch.de) : > > Thank you. I tried it, and it works, but it takes up more space. > Is there a way to condence such code? Size here is important to me. What do you mean by "takes up more space"? More space than what? Do you really mind the few bytes to call the convenience functions? I guess that is still shorter than implement them in C yourself because they are written in assembler. Why is size important? Are you actually running out of memory? If not this smells like premature optimization. Ciao, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch -- “Intellectual property suffers in most cases from a significant lack of the intellectual part.” -- yepp in c.l.python ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-12-28 17:01:45 CET