On Mittwoch 24 September 2008, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:50:19AM +0200, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > > This might be nice (at least, for some of us). Unfortunately, it would > > add much overhead, as these pseudo-directories would have to be > > processed. > > And it would clash with devices that *do* support directories or > partitions. At least the implementation would be quite complex. i'd simply implement them a bit different, and use a colon to seperate drive number, ie 8:the/path/file and now, since that is a bit annoying to parse (the number could have one or two digits) i'd simply use letters instead, "A" representing device 0 etc I:/the/path/file thats almost trivial to parse with little overhead also i'd totally ignore the drive numbers used on cbm dual drives. thats such a special case, it can do with special case handling. -- http://www.hitmen-console.org http://www.pokefinder.org http://ftp.pokefinder.org IBM is not a necessary evil. IBM is not necessary. <Ted Nelson> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Sep 24 17:29:37 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-09-24 17:29:38 CEST