Hi! On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:23:09PM +0200, Christian Groessler wrote: > I don't know what the C standard says, but I would find > > char (fastcall *f)(char); > > more intuitive. I seem to remember when working with Watcom and 16bit DOS > code, I was able to write "char (far *f)(char);"... Now as you say it ... It seems that parsing "fastcall", "near" and "far" is somewhat broken in cc65. I will have a look at it, thanks! Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Aug 17 18:32:33 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-08-17 18:32:35 CEST