Re: [cc65] Questions for CBM guys

From: <>
Date: 2008-03-03 12:24:31
On 2008-03-03, at 08:44, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:

> The number 15 must be a misunderstanding of the (theoretically) 15
> possible open channels, defined by the secondary address (the X in  
> open
> 1,8,x, with x=15 being the special command channel). I do not know  
> where
> this limitation comes from: The IEC bus would allow for secondary
> addresses of even 0-30 (I am not totally sure about 31, so I will keep
> it out).

And while we are at the secondary addresses - is there a reliable  
source of information on the meaning of *ALL* the secondary addresses  
for various IEC devices available?

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Mon Mar 3 12:24:43 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2008-03-03 12:24:46 CET