Re: [cc65] Questions for CBM guys

On 2008-03-03, at 08:44, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:

> The number 15 must be a misunderstanding of the (theoretically) 15
> possible open channels, defined by the secondary address (the X in  
> open
> 1,8,x, with x=15 being the special command channel). I do not know  
> where
> this limitation comes from: The IEC bus would allow for secondary
> addresses of even 0-30 (I am not totally sure about 31, so I will keep
> it out).

And while we are at the secondary addresses - is there a reliable  
source of information on the meaning of *ALL* the secondary addresses  
for various IEC devices available?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.