Hi Dan, > Unfortunately not much, because the functions aren't > static or fastcall (either or both would help). I see. So I'll try converting them into macros first. > I've been compiling cc65 with Microsoft's compiler, > with no trouble at all. You can ignore the makefile; > it doesn't do anything except compile the *.c files > and link. Couldn't be simpler. Thanks for the hint. > > And > > additionally I have no > > clue how to handlie those "magic" patch/diff things. > > That makes two of us. Hm, so what I'm supposed to do with the diff file (attached) you posted some days ago ?!? > > So after all it seems more reasonable to me that you > > take the NanoVM > > source and do some tests - especially as you know > > exactly what type of > > patterns / changes in th generated code you're > > looking for. > > I thought about that, but (1) I don't have CVS > installed, and (2) after browsing the source, I think > that an unmodified compile would not show much > improvement. I could send you the zipped CVS content if you're interested... Best, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-08-09 14:42:07 CEST