Re: [cc65] Java VM built with cc65

--- Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> wrote:

> Performance currently isn't that great so the NanoVM
> could be a nice
> vehicle for testing cc65 optimization
> improvements...

It looks like a big gain would result from converting
the small functions called by vm_run to macros. Also,
sp should be assigned to zero page (although you need
my patch to get the benefit).

Dan



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato? 
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.