From: silverdr; on Wednesday, June 20, 2007; at 12:58 PM -0400 > > I am not sure how long it is there but I remember > looking for it some long time ago, and then just accepting it not > being there. ;-) Hmm, I have a vague memory of adding the uninstall rule when I expanded the install rule. > As for the GNU make -- I'd have to check the sources if I am > not babbling BS, but wouldn't it be just as easy as passing a proper > DEF? I think most make-s accept that? In this case, I changed only "my" makefile. I exploited the facts that gmake will pass to sub-makes the options and assignments from the command-line; and normally, similar assignments in a makefile are replaced by the ones from the command-line. Therefore, the gmakes for the "cc65/" and the "ld65/" subdirectories will use the paths from the top-level makefile instead of the ones that are set by the makefiles that are _two_ levels down from the top. I don't know how much of that stuff is done by other brands of make. They simply might use the assignments in those lower makefiles, always. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Jun 21 15:23:30 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-06-21 15:23:36 CEST