On 11/28/06, Hiroji Kimura <us3h-kmr@asahi-net.or.jp> wrote: > Now, I am just curios. Why does cc65 generate codes which depend on > subroutines like pushax and the secondary stack? Because the CPU stack in page 1 is far too small? A total of 256 bytes for return addresses, local variables, saved registers for interrupts, etc, is just not going to let your C programs do very much... -- Mark Reed <markjreed@mail.com> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Nov 29 05:11:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-11-29 05:11:06 CET