On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 05:57:56AM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > that sounds pretty extreme... are you sure you had the compiler optimization > enabled? (also, did you check ftp://ftp.musoftware.de/pub/groepaz/opt65.c ?) I could not test the thing because of flex constraints ("input rules are too complicated (>= 32000 NFA states)"), but I had a look at it. What Andrew does is to replace common blocks by subroutines. That works well with larger programs. The flex rules look like they are targeted to a specific program, so other programs won't benefit as much. Which is not a problem if you generate new rules specific for a program. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Apr 5 09:38:31 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-04-05 09:38:34 CEST