> > > On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 04:11:46AM -0500, Andrew J. Kroll wrote: > > Here is the small patch that seems to fix the bug. I hope I did the right > > thing, but it does seem to fix the problem. > > Not really. Your patch considers any K&R function equal to any new style > prototype, which is not, what should happen. From ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E), <SNIP> > The place is right, and the change will work around the problem, but as a side > effect, it accepts invalid code. It is ok to make your code compile, but it is > not sufficient as a general solution for cc65. <SNIP> Excellent. Well, now that the leg work is done in finding the point of issue, The janitorial work on the actual fix should be alot easier for you. Glad I could be of some form of assitance. I can't wait to see the official patch. Yours, -- Andrew J. Kroll Software and Hardware Engineer and Consultant Grafixoft http://dr.ea.ms/HW/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Apr 1 23:02:55 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-04-01 23:02:58 CEST