Re: [cc65] Proposal for CA65 improvement(?): .maclib directive

Hi,

Why an .include "macrolib.s" directive is not enough? 

One can place all (or some of) the macros that will be
shared across different projects in an include file. I
don't think that typing

        .maclib foo

is significantly easier than:

        .include "foo.s"

if one uses an include directory for the assembler.

Am I missing something?

By the way, an environment variable for ca65 include
directory (which is generaly different of the one for
cc65, at least in my projects) would be cool.

Fatih.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.