On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:34:19AM +0100, chris wrote: > I wonder if I could use both lcc and ca65 and ld65 ? > You told me that the assembler does support 65816 but > is it true for the linker (if applicable) ? There's nothing in the linker that limits it to 16 bit. So yes, the linker will also work for the 816. There may be minor issues not detected because most programs are 16 bit programs, but if so, they're definitely no design limitations and should be rather easy to fix. > In that case I could modify lcc and output assembler > files using ca65 syntax. Since I don't know the assembler and linker backends used with lcc, I cannot judge, how worthwhile this is. My suggestion would be to translate one or two generated assembler files manually or with a perl script, and assemble/link the final programs from it, just to see if there are any problems lurking. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Dec 11 13:20:43 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-12-11 13:20:46 CET