On Wednesday 30 November 2005 09:07, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:41:09AM +0100, Sidney Cadot wrote: > > Aha, ok.... It seems to /almost/ work .... :^) But it's in the docs, > > I see that now (<blush>). > > What happens is that just a pointer is passed, but the function will access > the struct as if there was a copy on the stack, effectively destroying > stack locations, it doesn't own. is it really that much of a problem to make this work? ... uhm...not that i would ever use or even need it, but anyway :) the compiler has reached an amazing level of standard compliance already, would be pretty cool to get rid of the remaining few bits :=P -- http://www.hitmen-console.org http://www.gc-linux.org/docs/yagcd.html http://www.pokefinder.org http://ftp.pokefinder.org Bad officials are the ones elected by good citizens who do not vote. <George Jean Nathan> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Nov 30 09:15:51 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-30 09:15:53 CET