Sorry for the delay, I've catched a cold and was mostly staying in bed the last few days. On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 06:02:01PM +0100, MagerValp wrote: > Yeah... I've tried to make a minimal test case, but it doesn't seem to > trigger easily. I can send you my sources if you want. That would be nice. > Well, it's not the last segment, since TILEDATA follows. If BSS > simply wasn't written to the file, TILEDATA should be moved $614 > bytes, not just 61. What I meant was "last segment in memory area". After the last segment of a memory area has been handled, the "fill" attribute is evaluated. If this attribute is true, it shouldn't matter if the last segment was a bss segment or not, because what was not written would be filled in the next step. At least in theory ... > No, the map file still thinks that tile_bmp_tab_lo starts at $ae80, > when it actually starts at $ae43. You have to be careful here, because file positions and "relocated to" positions do not necessarily match. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Nov 20 13:23:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-20 13:23:09 CET