>> program won't run anyway. Which in turn means that one should only use >> uint8_t if it's an absolute requirement to have a datatype with exactly >> 8 >> bits. Otherwise it's better to use uint_least8_t, which has at least 8 >> bits >> and is a required type. > > mmmh ok, not so great excuse then :) i still prefer my u8/u16/u32 types, > i'm lazy with typing :=) Me too :-), and I have sources that have to compile with about 15 ompilers from 8 to 64bit CPUs, so having "company standard" types like u8/u16/u32 that maybe are just typedefs of uint8_t are more portable. Rgds, -- 42Bastian Schick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Aug 17 06:07:28 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-17 06:07:31 CEST