Re: [cc65] Arrays of structs

From: 42Bastian Schick <bastian421monlynx.de>
Date: 2005-08-17 06:07:20
>> program won't run anyway. Which in turn means that one should only use
>> uint8_t if it's an absolute requirement to have a datatype with exactly 
>> 8
>> bits. Otherwise it's better to use uint_least8_t, which has at least 8 
>> bits
>> and is a required type.
>
> mmmh ok, not so great excuse then :) i still prefer my u8/u16/u32 types, 
> i'm lazy with typing :=)

Me too :-), and I have sources that have to compile with about 15
ompilers from 8 to 64bit CPUs, so having "company standard" types
like u8/u16/u32 that maybe are just typedefs of uint8_t are more portable.

Rgds,

-- 
42Bastian Schick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Wed Aug 17 06:07:28 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-17 06:07:31 CEST