Re: [cc65] Arrays of structs

From: Groepaz <>
Date: 2005-08-16 18:09:20
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 18:04, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Groepaz wrote:
> > mmmh doesnt C99 even define some standard types (uint8) for that?
> From ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E), "Exact-width integer types":
>   1 The typedef name intN_t designates a signed integer type with width N,
>     no padding bits, and a two s complement representation. Thus, int8_t
> denotes a signed integer type with a width of exactly 8 bits.
>   2 The typedef name uintN_t designates an unsigned integer type with width
> N. Thus, uint24_t denotes an unsigned integer type with a width of exactly
> 24 bits.
>   3 These types are optional. However, if an implementation provides
> integer types with widths of 8, 16, 32, or 64 bits, it shall define the
> corresponding typedef names.
> Please note the word "optional" in the standard:-)

*yawn* :=P

ok, another great excuse for me to not use them :=)


When animal-rights activists and right-to-life protesters are marching outside 
your laboratory, then you know you've definitely made progress in your 
artificial life research. 
<Donald A. Smith>

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Tue Aug 16 18:09:30 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-16 18:09:32 CEST