Re: [cc65] New features

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2005-08-10 11:26:56
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 07:02:31PM -0400, Greg King wrote:
> I think that "weak = yes" should be the default because we put names in the
> configure script, instead of the library/program source, so that they can
> be changed more easily.  Very rarely will we want one of those symbols to
> be "locked in stone".

Any supporters? I don't think it's a big deal, because the number of symbols
in the linker config will probably be limited, but it's no problem to change
the default behaviour if this makes sense.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Wed Aug 10 11:27:05 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-08-10 11:27:08 CEST