On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:06:54AM -0400, Greg King wrote: > However, we can't predict what variables might be needed by future loadable > modules! So, I guess that we need three zero-page segments: a named one > for the compiler, a named one for the library, and ".zeropage" for > programmers' general use. Most standard linker configurations don't allocate any space besides the one needed for the standard cc65 runtime zeropage variables. So I don't see an advantage in freeing the standard name for general use. Besides that, the compiler does also use the standard names for all other segments. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Jul 24 16:34:57 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-07-24 16:34:59 CEST