Hello, * On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:52:13PM +0200 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > In general, there's a problem with forward references and variables. As an > extreme example, how should the following get evaluated? > > foo = bar + 10 > .word foo ; ? > foo = foo + 10 > .word foo ; ? > bar = foo + 10 > .word bar ; ? > foo = bar + 10 > .word foo ; ? > bar = 3 Would it make sense to introduce two types of LABELs, one which has to remain static, and one which can be changed? The labels which can be changed could be as follow: It gets the value that was defined when the assembler entered that statement. Something like the C macros. Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon May 9 14:18:53 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-05-09 14:18:55 CEST