Hi! On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote: > I have a problem with this piece of code, I think the compiler is > generating wrong assembler. [...] > Am I right? Yes, it's a bug. The code generator does not honor the CF_TEST flag when the data type is long and the addressing mode is auto. Here's the necessary patch for the snapshot version: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff -c -b -r1.97 codegen.c *** codegen.c 30 Jun 2004 19:18:56 -0000 1.97 --- codegen.c 11 Mar 2005 12:50:14 -0000 *************** *** 840,845 **** --- 840,848 ---- case CF_LONG: ldyconst (offs+3); AddCodeLine ("jsr ldeaxysp"); + if (flags & CF_TEST) { + AddCodeLine ("jsr tsteax"); + } break; default: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks a lot for the report! Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Mar 11 13:52:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-03-11 13:52:12 CET