Hello, * On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:41:38PM +0100 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > BTW: Would cc65-module be a suitable "OS version" for my work, or should > > I go and try to "register" another one? > > This is up to André to decide. [...] > This would need a small change in the linker, because currently no > exports and imports are allowed when generating cc65 modules. Ok. I do not think that this change is worth the effort. Furthermore, it is "cool" to have an own type. ;-) As my "modules" most likely will never be written in C due to the floppy's RAM restrictions, it might not be a good idea nevertheless. Furthermore, it is a good way to distinguish if such a module was intended to be run with opencbm anyway. > But even this would need changes in the linker, because it does > currently not allow other than the three known ids. Wouldn't it be a good idea to allow the linker to use id numbers in addition to the ID names. BTW, what's the name (to be specified with the linker) of the three IDs? OSA65, CC65 and lunix? Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Jan 22 17:53:30 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-01-22 17:53:41 CET