Hello Uz, * On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 02:21:47PM +0100 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > No, it's a bug in ca65. A unary plus should of course be allowed. Ok. Your patch works as expected. Now, my simple example runs from the start to the end. :) > > ld65-5.html#ss5.8 does not mention if other OS versions than > > Lunix are supported. http://www.6502.org/users/andre/o65/fileformat.html > > mentions the OSA/65 header supplement, and you told me that there is a > > version for cc65 use. > > Version of what? I mean the "OS version" of the (x)o65 file format. André's page describes two types (OSA/65, Lunix), and I know from the conversation with you that there is a third, official one, cc65-module. BTW: Would cc65-module be a suitable "OS version" for my work, or should I go and try to "register" another one? > This means that the compiler is not conforming to the ISO C99 > standard, which states that __STDC_VERSION__ must be a predefined > macro. Ok, I did not know this. > The problem why the code doesn't work is probably that the compiler > doesn't define __STDC_VERSION__, but seems to include stdint.h (which > is a header file new in C99) somewhere, so there are name collisions. Yes, this is what I deduced myself, too. > BTW: cc65 doesn't define __STDC_VERSION__ either, but the case is somewhat > different ... Well, don't you support C99? (just kidding) Thank you again, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Jan 21 20:15:57 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-01-21 20:16:07 CET