Re: [cc65] scanf again

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2004-11-26 23:49:22
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 01:38:20PM +0100, MagerValp wrote:
> OK. Since _scanf.c has been written, is the wrapper function all that
> is missing? And from reading the source I don't see where ungetc is
> needed.

I've added the missing functions. The library does now support the full list
of scanf functions. _scanf is somewhat more standards compliant than before,
but it's still a hack in some places and needs more testing. I will put some
more time into testing this weekend, but since you have this program that
seems to need scanf, my hope is that you could give the current version a try
and report any problems:-)

Packages containing the new functions are available from the ftp server.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Nov 26 23:49:27 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-11-26 23:49:37 CET