On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:44:37PM -0400, Greg King wrote: > I like that style, too. So, I wrote my own GNUmakefiles that work that > way. But, Uz doesn't use that style -- at least, not in the library > subtree (interestingly, the development tool subtree does work in that > autonomous way). Not really. Executing make in one of the tool directories will only build the tool specific files, not the common library. The idea behind it is that the makefiles mirror the directory structure: They build anything in the directory and below it. That the libraries do not work in this way has been lazyness on my side instead of a real design decision. I would prefer the same behaviour, and - as I do know now - this goal is achievable with only a few small changes. When I created the first sub makefiles, I didn't realize that. It is a good idea to make these files compatible with the remainder of the sources. > You rebuild a single library by starting in the parent subdirectory, and > naming that library as a make goal: > cd cc65/libsrc; make lynxlib You can even do a make -C cc65/libsrc lynxlib > A desire for portability is one of the reasons for the current method. Uz > wanted many host systems to be able to build the cc65 package -- DOS-like > ones, as well as Unix-like ones. He wants us to be able to modify any > file, then update all of the libraries -- for all targets -- without > resorting to fancy makefile tricks. [I love to write those tricks -- but, > I'm weird. ;-) ] With some effort it would be possible to make the makefiles smarter about already built modules. However, this would not only involve a much more complex makefile, but also more disk space, because the object files cannot be mixed between the different systems, so they would have to go into target specific subdirectories. But the current scheme works well in my daily development work, so I see no need to change it. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Oct 22 20:52:04 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-10-22 20:52:14 CEST