On Saturday 25 September 2004 21:01, Mats Andrén wrote: > Yeah, hmm.. I get your point. However, the reason for wanting me to > have things this way was that I want to be able to save the player > together with the tune when people are finished with their tune. Then > it would be convenient just to have it lying around at $1000 so it > could just be dumped to disk, straight away. Also, I would not have to > "translate" pointers to music data and that stuff, when saving all the > stuff to disk. But, then again, I'm new to this kind of hifi coding > and maybe I should rethink this whole program structure issue a bit.. > ;) > > Thanks for your answer! you will need some kind of "packer" (to condense music data from editable format into something more memory friendly) and a "relocator" for your player/editor anyways....what you are saying may sound "easier" at first, but it has a lot of drawbacks for real world usage. just look at how this kind of stuff is handled in other existing editors. (and dont get fooled by the fact that some/a lot _do_ have the player at $1000 even in the editor - that has other reasons) gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Sep 25 21:04:37 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-09-25 21:04:45 CEST