On Wednesday 22 September 2004 15:15, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 11:49:53PM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > > most importantly...IF you'd introduce some kind of predefined values, a > > combination of peekpoke and the vicstruct would even be portable (between > > platforms that have a vic) > > I have to admit that I don't understand this sentence. Using the VIC struct > *is* portable, provided that the struct lies within the current bank. uhmz no, that would assume that the value to store in "vic+0x18" is always the same, ie the character rom is always located at the same place. like VIC+0x18=0x15 is _not_ portable, but VIC+0x18=CHARROM_LOWERCASE would be. gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Sep 22 15:22:36 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-09-22 15:22:44 CEST