Re: [cc65] Including binary-stuff question

From: Groepaz <groepaz1gmx.net>
Date: 2004-09-06 19:26:11
On Monday 06 September 2004 19:30, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 05:18:10PM +0200, Groepaz wrote:
> > why would any sane person do that? to increase compile time by
> > large extend? argls :(
> 
> Well, it's definitely good to have a solution that works independent of any
> assembler features. Being able to do all sorts of text manipulation with the
> "builtin" tools is one of the powers of unix.

yes ofcourse - but unless you need to write something that must be portable
across a dozen platforms, there is always the assembler or even objcopy.
converting binary to sourcecode only to compile it to binary is only the
last resort IMHO.

gpz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Mon Sep 6 19:34:18 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-09-06 19:34:27 CEST