Hi, > That info. suggests that an easy division of the code would be: > o put DOS 3 file-functions into the "apple2/" sub-directory; > o put ProDOS file-functions into the "apple2enh/" sub-directory. To be honest I don't think so. That would be like saying Pentium 3 support goes only with Win9x/WinME and Pentium 4 support is tied to Win2k/WinXP. That would match a lot of PCs out there but technically makes no sense - does it? - ProDOS can make use of more memory but needs more memory for itself. Therefore it is more attractive to use it with machines with more memory. - ProDOS knows about subdirectories. Therefore it is more attractive to use it on machines with bigger disks. - ... But these things are more or less soft facts. The hard fact is that - as mentioned - the assembly language interfaces of DOS 3.3 and ProDOS 8 are totally different. This means that all existing assembly language program will only run on one DOS or the other. This means that people are most of the time not free to decide what they use but have to use what their favorite programs are built against. In many cases this means using both DOS's. Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Jul 29 08:44:35 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-07-29 08:44:44 CEST