RE: [cc65] stack corruption

>The C standard from 1989 (15 years ago) has named the "implicit int"
feature
>"obsolete, is likely to be removed". I would say, that is more than just
>personal preference:-)

Hi Everyone,

Right.
The main short-comings I see in the original C were:

	- implicit int (which you mentioned)
      - no mandatory function prototypes
      - weakly typed enum's

Is there a move afoot anywhere to make enum's strongly typed?

Cheers,

Paul


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.