Hi! On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:32:21PM -0700, Shawn Jefferson wrote: > How do you use indirect zeropage addressing in ca65 > (with --cpu 65C02)? I want to do: > > LDA ($20) and STA ($20) but it says illegal addressing > mode. Works here without problems: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ca65 V2.10.5 - (C) Copyright 1998-2004 Ullrich von Bassewitz Main file : t.s Current file: t.s 000000r 1 000000r 1 B2 00 lda ($00) 000002r 1 92 00 sta ($00) 000004r 1 000004r 1 000004r 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Can you define and use a variable that was declared > zeropage, and exported with exportzp in a C program? Yes. This is what #pragma zpsym ("foo"); is for. > Do you do this in C: > extern unsigned char zpvar; You need an additional #pragma zpsym ("zpvar"); to let the compiler know that this is a zeropage variable and emit the correct import statement. > and can this work with a struct declaration like this: > extern struct MYSTRUCT zpvar; Yes, it does work. However, the compiler won't treat such variables special besides importing them with .importzp instead of .import. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Jun 4 10:27:28 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-06-04 10:27:36 CEST