Re: [cc65] .cpu none?

On Thursday 15 April 2004 18:26, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:

> How about symbols? Is it useful only for macro names, or is it also
> desirable to have symbols with the names of 6502 instructions:
>
>         jmp     jsr
>
> jsr:    lda     #>(rts-1)
>         pha
>         lda     #<(rts-1)
>         pha
>         jmp     subroutine
> rts:

wow, that looks scary :o)

however, i think stuff like this should still be possible (although
not very useful and beeing terrible programming style, admitted :))

gpz

ps: reminds me of some other guys code i was crawling through some
(long) time ago....

D011:	lda #$00
	... lot of code
	sta D011+1

eeeeks :=P

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.