From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-11-22 03:18:32
There seem to be quite a few people up late in the night for coding :-)
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 03:08:09AM +0100, Benjamin Bahnsen wrote:
> I tried to speed up my code by using the -O option when compiling and
> linking with cl65, but the resulting program doesn't work anymore. The program
> always crashes. I found out that it has something to do with my interrupts
> (which only consist of assembler code). If i turn interrupts off, my program
> works fine and much faster than without the -O option.
> Why doesn't the optimization work if interrupts are turned on?
Sorry, but this can have many reasons, and you didn't give enough information
for a really helpful answer.
For one, it may be a compiler problem. Second, it can be a timing problem.
Unoptimized code is a lot slower, which may give problems depending on your
code. Third, it may be a problem with the data exchange between your interrupt
handler and the main program. And fourth, it may be something else:-)
I've written at least one C program with a non trivial interrupt handler in
assembler, and it works without problems with -Oirs. So I don't think it's a
general problem with interrupt handlers and C code.
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-11-22 03:18:45 CET