From: Spiro Trikaliotis (trik-news_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2003-10-09 22:23:14
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:04:56PM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:08, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > the contiki gtk port has the code you want :=) and i am sure adam would gladly > provide you with everything else you'd need. I am already in contact with Adam. > the big question is why a non working "feature" is left in the program. if > noone cares, remove it. If it is not fixed immediately, it does not mean it will never be fixed. > (ofcourse making certain visual improvements that > require 2ghz machine are more important, i can understand that :=P) If you would be on the ML, you would see that these visual improvements are in fact the most wanted features, yes! > and thats the reason why i refuse to make some of my projects open source > and instead port them to several OSs myself. open development teams that > dont have a strong leadership and strict rules always end up in producing > various different versions of the same software. This means: We should have dropped every architecture which did not support all features? This means, after 1.13, every non-windows architecture would've been dropped. > open source is not an excuse for releasing crap, thats another common > misbelief :=) Thanks. It's crap? > x64 -autostart bla.d81 > > the problem is that the drive doesnt get initialized correctly under certain > conditions. > the fix is to use load":*",8,1 instead of load"*",8,1 How do you issue a load command if you do an autostart? "under certain conditions"... Do you have these conditions in a more specific way? This would help a lot. > NMI generated by rs232 freezes the emulator...frequently hitting > "restore" will make the program go on like it should. this bug appeared after > certain other nmi code was "fixed" :=P (not that it was broken before) Do you have a working demo? > i dont even remember i have to admit, i have not used these filerequester crap > for a while now (someone else told me that one, and he reported it aswell - how > ever its still not fixed in latest release) "Someone told me someday that something goes wrong on certain conditions." Despite of hearsay, that's a bug report every developer likes! > no fuckin' clue :o) i personally avoid using *nix filerequesters of any sort > since they are mostly unuseable for me (*nix gui developers seem to hate the > term "intuition" :=P) Where do you find better GUIs? > you should better ask why certain vice developers dont listen to what ppl say > even IF the are around on irc :) If the reports are as specific as the one above, I understand why they don't listen. :-p > > Even if some do, they do not > > always forward everything to the VICE Developers ML. > > that can only be blamed on your lazy developers though :=) If the bug report is of this big "quality", why should anyone forward it? There's almost no chance the bug will be even reproducible. > i have done that once, and got an answer telling me "if you want it fixed, fix > it yourself. noone cares.". that was my first and last bug report on vice, sorry. Please remember that everyone is doing VICE as a hobby. Furthermore, think of some of your own comments on some mailing lists, they are not always polite either. Spiro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-10-09 22:30:50 CEST