From: Maciej Witkowiak (ytm_at_elysium.pl)
Date: 2003-10-04 18:24:01
Groepaz dnia 01 paź 2003 o 22:00 +0200 napisał: > > > Great idea! ;-) Do you think that would even be remotely possible? > > > > The only problem would be with small amount of available memory under GEOS. > > I don't know if REU would help as a swap device. On the other hand, Contiki > > could overwrite unneeded parts of GEOS kernal space. > > but removing geos from memory would make the contiki port a bit questionable > :=P Things in GEOS that Contiki could benefit from: - disk drive turbos - low level file I/O routines (find file, list directory etc.) - graphics engine for drawing windows/menus - pointer provided by OS. There is 22KB available if GEOS menu/gfx engine would be used. If using text screen only, we have 34KB (in two chunks: 26+8) available. Plain CBM conio would replace GEOS graphics then, pointer could still be managed by OS. With VDC gfx there is 22+8KB free, with VDC text - 30+8KB. Is it enough or not? ytm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-10-05 09:39:21 CEST