From: Shawn Jefferson (sjefferson_at_sd62.bc.ca)
Date: 2003-09-09 17:34:23
>>> Groepaz <groepaz_at_gmx.net> 09/09/03 05:30AM >>> >On Tuesday 09 September 2003 01:05, Shawn Jefferson wrote: > >> I realized that the test was actually running for 2 seconds, not 2 minutes. >> That was 345 plots per second. Does that sound better? > >from a democoders point of view.... at about 768 plots per *frame* (3840 plots >per second) it starts getting impressive :=P In my defense, this function has to support arbitrary sizes of bitmaps, where in a demo you probably know how big your screen is going to be so you can optimize for that... there is also the fact that demo coders actually have some skills. ;) I figure I could further optimize by rewriting in assembly, and passing the arguments via some global zero page variables (this would speed up pretty much all functions), and maybe some more that I haven't thought of yet. This was never meant to be used for coding games or demos, so at some point I am going to say, "good enough." ¯ Shawn Jefferson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-09-09 17:37:07 CEST