From: Marko Mäkelä (marko.makela_at_hut.fi)
Date: 2003-08-29 10:30:13
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:48:57AM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > mmmmh, i'm curious myself here, this translated without error before - > although i'm puzzled about '\v' and '\b', never seen nor used them before, > are these even standard ? (and what are they at all?) :=P Here is an incomplete list off the top of my head. The information in parentheses is implementation defined: \a=alert (BEL, ctrl-g) \b=backspace (ctrl-h) \t=horizontal tabulator (ctrl-i) \n=newline (ctrl-j) \v=vertical tabulator (ctrl-k) \f=form feed (ctrl-l) \r=carriage return (ctrl-m) > this compiles fine with gcc, cc65 gives "too few arguments in function call". > > not that i would personally find good use for this "feature" but well...the > standard.... :=P (wtf is this going to do anyway, some weirdo k&r thing i > suppose? :)) Is it worth supporting the K&R C? If I remember correctly, the newest GCC has dropped support for it. You defined f(i) with one argument (implicitly int, I guess) and called it with no arguments. ISO 9899 has been around for more than a decade - why should anyone still use the non-standard K&R C, except when maintaining code written for an obsolete compiler? Marko ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-08-29 10:31:32 CEST