From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-08-02 11:56:13
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:46:57PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be an "install" target in the makefiles. Is
> this deliberate ? If not, would you be interested in a patch ?
I wouldn't say that it is deliberate, it is more that I don't need it. When
testing, I'm using full paths to the compiler and tools. When doing installs,
I'm using the RPM packages - so there's no real need for me to add an install
target. Having such a target would mean that I will have to keep it up to date
and test it every time something changes - which is definitely more work for
me than it is now.
Unemcumbered with these facts I'm willing to add an install target if there is
a need for it. So people compiling the package on a Unix like operating
system, who would prefer to have a "make install", please speak up.
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-08-02 11:56:45 CEST