Re: [cc65] Possible bug WRT NULs in string literals

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-07-17 14:57:20 

On Thursday 17 July 2003 14:55, Andre Majorel wrote:
> For the following C code :
>
>     const unsigned char charset[32] =
>       "\x00\x15\x20\x00\x20\x00\x20\x00"
>       "\x00\x14\x02\x04\x0a\x04\x0a\x04"
>       "\x20\x00\x20\x00\x20\x05\x2a\x1f"
>       "\x0a\x04\x0a\x04\x0a\x14\x2a\x3c";
>
> cc65 generates :
>
>     .segment        "RODATA"
>
>     _charset:
> 	    .byte   $00
> 	    .res    31,$00
>
> It would appear that cc65 does not support embedded NULs in
> string literals. I can't quote chapter and verse in the standard
> but I believe this is incorrect. cc65 is certainly the only C
> compiler I know that does that.

mmmh arent those values supposed to be octal ? \x[something] looks unfamiliar 
to me atleast :=P

gpz

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-07-17 15:00:29 CEST