From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-05-11 20:18:42
On Sunday 11 May 2003 00:54, MagerValp wrote: > Is there ever a good reason for writing <symbol (as opposed to > #<symbol)? If not, would it be possible to have the assembler emit a > warning if it runs across it? indeed there is, to make sure a zeropage-adressed opcode is emitted... ie file1: .export foo foo=$02 file2: .import foo lda <foo ok, there might be better examples than this but you get the idea :o) however, i would like this kinda warning(s) aswell.... another one that would be useful would be if a symbol that fits into 8 bit is assembled as a 2 bytes adress (as if you had omitted the "<" in the above example). gpz ps: all those might go into a "verbose" warning level since they might be somewhat confusing otherwhise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-05-11 19:23:18 CEST