From: Greg King (gngking_at_erols.com)
Date: 2003-05-04 22:19:10
From: Ullrich von Bassewitz Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2003, 05:09 AM > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 11:21:30PM +0200, Adam Dunkels wrote: > > How about "[device:][drive:]name[;version]", i.e., with optional > > device- and drive-numbers? The test for if a drive: is present > > would be quite simple, as well: > > if(name[1] == ':' && isdigit(name[0])); > > I'm not sure if this will work, since both numbers are optional. > In a name like > > 1:foobar > > is "1" a device-number or a drive-number? > > In addition to that, there are device-numbers up to 31 (at least for the > CBMs), so your simple test is not enough (unfortunately). I prefer the Unix style: filename drive#:filename /unit#/filename /unit#/drive#:filename /unit#//directory1/directory2/filename /unit#//directory1/directory2/partition#:filename /unit#/partition#:/directory1/directory2/filename There is no ambiguity. (The next-to-last path-name is used by Creative Micro Designs drives. The last path-name might be used by more-modern hard-drive systems.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-05-04 23:59:08 CEST