From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-05-02 23:27:00
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 11:08:20PM +0200, Groepaz wrote:
> btw loosely related to this... i once thought it would be nice to have an
> assembler commandline option that makes the assembler forget about all and
> every opcode, so you could even abuse it (and also, the whole rest of the
> toolkit) for a completely different cpu just by writing some macros. (i
> wouldnt mind a decent assembler for the gameboy work hehe). maybe --cpu=none
> could do just this? would be a fancy feature imho :=)
I had similar ideas - like using the assembler to generate arbitrary binary
files, like a network configuration for some completely unrelated machine:-)
> check this site if you want to know more... there exists also a c-compiler for
> the pcengine, maybe you want to check that for inspiration or sth :) (dunno
> how good it works though, havent used that one...its looks to me as if its
> neither lcc nor small-c, so it might actually be interisting to check)
Just had a look at it. It's a small-c derivate, and not even derived from the
later small-c but from one of the early versions that didn't have a real
scanner.
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-05-02 23:27:14 CEST