From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-03-10 11:50:28
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:46:57AM +0100, Tim Schürmann wrote:
> If you need a fast floating-point format, so what about radix-4 (Ok, i don't know
> how fast and small it could be implemented on a 8-Bit computer :) )?
This seems to be a misunderstanding. I don't need a fast floating point
format. What I've said was that I'm willing to consider an already existing
floating point library if hard numbers show that it is considerably faster
than a possible IEEE conformant implementation.
It will probably not happen in the near future, but if I would have added
floating point, I would have written a IEEE compatible library without looking
at something else:-)
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-03-10 11:50:34 CET