From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-03-06 23:43:49
On Thursday 06 March 2003 23:22, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > It would be of course interessting how much memory is left when IEEE is > > fully supported... (with <math.h>) > > The standard does not require a "double" to have 64 bit, and it does not > require a "double" to cover a greater numeric range than a "float". Which > means that one 32 bit floating point type could be used for both. 32 bit > IEEE floating point support should be less than 5K, I think (which is still > a lot, but not really bad). btw...(you know that i want floats aswell =P)....would steve woz's float routines be sufficient? would they be "licence compatible" ? they actually look quite reasonable to me, not to big and the code looks reasonable tight and fast aswell (though i have i admit i never tested it)... (oh it looks much like much less than 5k actually....just the basic operations ofcoz, no atan2 etc stuff :=)) gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-03-06 23:37:53 CET