From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-03-06 23:02:17
On Thursday 06 March 2003 16:28, Steve Nicklin wrote: > Although it's great to be so enthusiastic, I would (personal opinion) much > rather see people's efforts being concentrated on making what is an already > great product (CC65) an even better and better product than currently. > > We can always get greedy and want more and more of a range of products, but > I'd rather see a bug free and more enhanced CC65 than another compiler. Uz > seems to be working so hard on this, lets get any support right behind him! i have to second that. there just so many halfassed tools around....cc65 is one of the few great exceptions actually. i personally wont discourage anyone from writing a c++ compiler (although i wont ever use it, may it ever see the light) but i dont think it makes a whole lot of sence... these small machines have a hard time with running even ordinary C-compiled programs. and the actual c-compiler has enough room for improvements aswell....i'd vote for removing these first before even remotely thinking about anything new in that respect :) gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-03-06 22:56:23 CET