RE: [cc65] C++ compiler for the 6502/6510 (CC66)?

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Greg Long (cc65_at_maneuveringspeed.com)
Date: 2003-03-06 16:11:49 

Well, Java would be a bit heavy and slow, but C++ should be about as
fast as C I'd think... maybe a speed penalty during some constructors
and destructors and returning sizable objects.

Actually, I think I'd be happy with doubles for now :)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cc65_at_musoftware.de [mailto:owner-cc65_at_musoftware.de] On
Behalf Of Christian Krüger
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:54 AM
To: 'cc65_at_musoftware.de'
Subject: Re: [cc65] C++ compiler for the 6502/6510 (CC66)?


Hi,

> One thing that is apparent, is that C++ is rapidly becoming the 
> standard... it would be nice to see a full featured C++ compiler.  I 
> will offer to help as time allows, but would others be interested in 
> developing a C++ compiler?  I am in Data Structures this term, GUI 
> next, won't take compilers until next Winter probably. Still, I'm
> sure I could  be of assistance.

what comes next? Anybody for JAVA on the C16? ;-)

SCNR
chrisker 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-03-06 16:13:10 CET