From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-03-06 00:16:16
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 17:26, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 03:45:58PM +0100, Groepaz wrote: > > > surely there must be others who've migrated from MS C++ to CC65 who > > > undestand the frustration. > > > > just the frustrating bit is M$ C++, not cc65 :o) keep in mind that cc65 > > tries to be as close to the standard (ANSI/POSIX) as possible, which M$ > > never even remotely cared about. > > I'm definitely no Microsoft fan, but their compiler is pretty standard > compliant. Yes, it has a rand() function and this function is defined in > stdlib.h as the standard says it has to be. > > There are problem with Microsoft compilers, but as far as the C standard > goes, the compiler is quite ok. mmmh well :o) i've had a couple of situations were M$ compiler would fail even for pretty simple c-code (not even c++) :o) i've sent more than a bunch of "bugreports" (they have other shiny names for that stuff at M$ :=P) some years ago actually...maybe it has become better lately, i have to admit that i dont know that (nor do i care hehe). gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-03-06 00:10:40 CET