From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-03-05 15:42:58
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:09:40PM -0800, Greg Long wrote: > This same sort, 19,000 random 16bit integers, took 256 minutes in > uncompiled BASIC. CC65's -Oi code does it in 10minutes, 34 seconds. doc/coding.html gives hints how to write code that is better suited for cc65. > 2) If the code is executed a second time, it crashes. Don't know > why...It may be due to the writing to RAM beneath the BASIC interpreter. > I went with 19,000 integers because in a BASIC routine, that was the > most that would fit in the standard 38,911 bytes available. Does CCS65 > modify and make calls to the BASIC interpreter? See doc/internal.txt. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-03-05 15:43:08 CET