RE: [cc65] Function prototyping - different in CC65?

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Greg Long (cc65_at_maneuveringspeed.com)
Date: 2003-03-04 21:22:10 

Yeah, they are pervasive. I found a linux group here in Klamath Falls,
I'm not a M$ diehard.  They employ a lot of talented people and produce
some really good software but the downside of M$ is....well, we don't
need to turn this into a debate over Microsoft.

If I can get a job developing for the C64 that pays $80k/yr I'm all over
it :)


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cc65_at_musoftware.de [mailto:owner-cc65_at_musoftware.de] On
Behalf Of Bryan Pope
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:02 PM
To: cc65_at_musoftware.de
Subject: Re: [cc65] Function prototyping - different in CC65?


And thusly Greg Long spake:
> 
> ahhh... I think I found the culprit.  I think there IS a rand() 
> function...wonder why I couldn't call it earlier...is it not in 
> time.h?
> 
> surely there must be others who've migrated from MS C++ to CC65 who 
> undestand the frustration.

According to K&R (the *true* makers of the standard) stdlib.h has the 
prototype for the rand () function.

Cheers,

Bryan

P.S. This seems to be another example of M$ trying to make a new
"standard"
>:-(

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-03-04 21:23:17 CET