From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-02-26 10:41:49
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:33:42AM +0100, Christian Kruger wrote:
> But to
> close with a wish, Uz, I would still appreciate if you could point
> out (doc) that (at the moment) the 65C02 mode is fully 65SC02
> compatible or introduce this mode too. As the Lynx is a 65SC02
> target, the 65C02 mode got a little bit the taste of unsafetyness
> for me... ;->
This is still in my TODO list, so it may happen some time:-)
> I'm not sure if this is the fastest way of accessing the
> joystick-'register' of suzy. Maybe the code
> generated by a struct access at a fixed address is
> no so efficient like the direct access of the absolute
> address...
The generated code is identical. Because of that, and because structs give
more readable C code (IMHO), I would suggest to use them. Constant addresses
(eventually hidden behind a #define) do of cause also work.
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-02-26 10:41:55 CET