From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-02-26 10:00:18
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:29:12PM -0800, Shawn Jefferson wrote:
> I'll have to do some more testing, but since you stated that no one has
> tested the 65C02 code generation... it may be that something is not generating
> properly. I have saved three assembly listings from my programs compiled in
> different ways (one with -O, one with --cpu 65C02 and one without, but haven't
> looked at them yet.) Most likely this stems from errors on my part, but I'll
> let you know if it's not.
Thanks!
> I would have expected the compiler to complain at the #include for the
> struct and #define if there were something wrong with it, but it only
> complains when I try to use the struct.
>
> test.c(27): Error: Identifier expected
Sorry, but this is not of more help than "the compiler complains bitterly".
Without knowing what happens around line 27 of test.c, and additional
information (prototypes of functions called, struct definitions used, #defines
expanded), this error message alone is absolutely useless.
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-02-26 10:00:25 CET